The Electronic Supervision System in the Opinion of Convicts in Prisons
Abstract
The subject of study and analysis is formulating an evaluation of Electronic Supervision System by convicts. As a tool author’s Questionnaire of Electronic Supervision System Evaluation was used which contained scale of lie. Frame of mind was also controlled. To verify hypothesis formulation methods diagnostic sounding and statistical and comparative analysis were used. Factor analysis demonstrated that perception of Electronic Supervision System doesn’t bring a unitary opinion-opinions of ESS are incoherent in which we can single out three factors : Negative evaluations, Positive evaluations and Stigmatization. It turned out that “non flashing” prisoners have much more negative evaluation results of ESS than “flashing” prisoners. There weren’t any significant differences in terms of positive evaluations and perceptible Stigmatization between ‘flashing” and “non flashing’ groups.
Keywords
Electronic Supervision System; stigmatization; evaluation of Electronic Supervision System
References
Bedyńska S., Książek M., 2012, Praktyczny przewodnik wykorzystania modeli regresji oraz równań strukturalnych, Akademickie Sedno, Warsaw.
Choynowski M., 1968, Opracowanie polskiej adaptacji „Inwentarza osobowości” H.J. Eysencka (Maudsley Personality Inventory), „Biuletyn Psychometryczny”, nr 2.
Ciosek M., Kmiecik K., 1987, Psychologia kliniczna, wprowadzenie do psychologii sądowo penitencjarnej, Uniwersytet Gdański, Gdańsk.
Drwal R.Ł., 1981, Osobowość wychowanków zakładów poprawczych, Ossolineum, Wrocław.
Eysenck H., Eysenck M., 1998, Podpatrywanie umysłu. Dlaczego ludzie zachowują się tak, jak się zachowują, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
Field A., 2013, Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, SAGE, London.
Lewandowski M., 1975, Pęknięcie ziemi, Czytelnik, Warsaw.
Malewski A., 1975, O nowy kształt nauk społecznych. Pisma zebrane, PWN, Warsaw.
Nowacki Z., 2010, Wywieranie wpływu społecznego w warunkach izolacji więziennej, Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”, Kraków.
Schweitzgebel R., 1967, Electronic Innovation in the Behavioral Sciences: A Call Toresponsibility, „American Psychologist”, nr 22.
Sielicki D., 2005, Elektroniczne monitorowanie przestępców – nowoczesna alternatywa pozbawienia wolności, „Przegląd Więziennictwa Polskiego”, nr 47–48.
Szaszkiewicz M., 1997, Tajemnice grypserki, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Ekspertyz Sądowych, Kraków.
Zimbardo P.G., 1973, On the Ethics of Intervention in Human Psychological Research: with Special Reference to the Stanford Prison Experiment, „Cognition”, nr 2.
Ordinance of the Minister of Justice of 27 February 2009 on the detailed technical specifications of devices within the technical means of electronic surveillance, and method on organizing these devices in a system and method of transmitting data inside this system (Journal of Laws 2009 nr 45, item 369).
Act of 6 June 1997 Executive Penal Code (Journal of Laws 1997 nr 90, item 557, as amended).
Act of 7 September 2007 on the enforcement of sentences of imprisonment outside the prison through electronic surveillance, original text: Journal of Laws 2007 nr 191, item 1366; i.e.: Journal of Laws 2008 nr 172, item 1069; i.e.: Journal of Laws 2010 nr 142, item 960.
Prison in Pińczów Poland
Copyright Notice:
Articles are published in accordance with conditions identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also called as CC-BY) license conditions, available on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ and this permission applies to any language version or any later version of the license as published by the Creative Commons organization.
Author retain the copyright to the article, while at the same time he/she transfers the article property rights to the Publisher free of charge (without territorial and time restrictions).
The online edition of the Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation is published under Open Access, which means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of these articles - are provided with full unrestricted access.
The publisher does not charge for providing access to full versions of articles nor for their use as referred to in above.
