Family and the local community as direct and indirect control agencies in prevention of criminal behawior
Abstract
The text discusses the theory of social control on the example of parental control and local community ways to conform its members. Both institutions of socialization enforce the social order by means of two forms of control: direct (external sanctions) and indirect (social bond). The text argues that a moderate level of control is a protective factor for crime.
References
[2] Anderson A.L., 2002, Individual and contextual influences on delinquency: the role of the single-parent family, „Journal of Criminal Justice”, Vol. 30.
[3] Becker H.S., 2009, Outsiderzy. Studia z socjologii dewiacji, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
[4] Burton Jr. V.S., Evans T.D., Kethineni S.R., Cullen F.T., Dunaway R.G., Payne G.L., 1995, The Impact of Prental Controls on Delinquency, „Journal of Criminal Justice”, Vol. 23, nr 2.
[5] Dennison S., Smallbone H., Stewart A., Freiberg K., Teague R., 2014, ‘My Life is Separated’. An Examination Of The Challenges And Barriers To Parenting For Indigenous Fathers In Prison, „British Journal of Criminology”, Vol. 54.
[6] Eitle D., 2006, Parental gender, single-parent families, and delinquency: Exploring the moderating influence of race/ethnicity, „Social Science Research”, nr 35.
[7] Free M.D., 1991, Clarifying the relationship between the broken home and juvenile delinquency: A critique of the current literature, „Deviant Behavior”, nr 12.
[8] Hirshi T., 1969, Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.
[9] Jachimczyk A., 2010, Technologia informatyczna jako możliwość realizacji postulatu Proaktywnego Modelu Probacji, [w:] Aktualne osiągnięcia w naukach społecznych a teoria i praktyka resocjalizacyjna, (red.) B. Urban, Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”, Kraków.
[10] Jakimiec D., 2016, Dysfunkcjonalność rodziny jako przedmiot postępowania wykonawczego w prawie rodzinnym i opiekuńczym. Zarys metodyki pracy sędziego w postępowaniu wykonawczym w sprawach rodzinnych i opiekuńczych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
[11] Kierkus Ch.A., Hewitt J.D., 2009, The contextual nature of the family structure/delinquency relationship, „Journal of Criminal Justice”, nr 37.
[12] Piotrowski P., 2011, Rozbój. Uwarunkowania psychospołeczne, motywacja i racjonalność sprawców, Wydawnictwo Akademickie „Żak”, Warszawa.
[13] Stanik J.M., 2013, Psychologia sądowa. Postawy, badania, aplikacje, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
[14] Wąsiński A., 2015, Znaczenie generatywności w osiąganiu dorosłości przez współczesnego człowieka, „Edukacja Dorosłych”, nr 1, s. 81–89.
[15] Wikström P-O. H., Oberwittler D., Treiber K., Hardie B., 2013, Breaking Rules. The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
University of Silesia in Katowice Poland
Copyright Notice:
Articles are published in accordance with conditions identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also called as CC-BY) license conditions, available on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ and this permission applies to any language version or any later version of the license as published by the Creative Commons organization.
Author retain the copyright to the article, while at the same time he/she transfers the article property rights to the Publisher free of charge (without territorial and time restrictions).
The online edition of the Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation is published under Open Access, which means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of these articles - are provided with full unrestricted access.
The publisher does not charge for providing access to full versions of articles nor for their use as referred to in above.
