Compulsory commitment of inmates into the restrictive housing in U.S. prisons – roles, goals and future dynamics
Abstract
Compulsory commitment of inmates into restrictive housing, or so called solitary confinement, administrative segregation, supermax, gives rise to many controversial issues that scientific research in the United States deals with. Subject to discussion are especially the constitutional controversies and the influence of such a treatment on the offender’s wellbeing as a human that tends to maintain social contact and that is vulnerable to possible negative impact of such strict conditions. Among scholars and practitioners there are opponents and also supporters of this solution, although internationally there is a conclusion (see the Nelson Mandela Rules) that restrictive housing should be banned, in particular when it is imposed on inmates for an indeterminate period or a prolonged period of time. Nowadays, the prevalent opinion is that other policies and practices should be worked out and implemented in order to replace restrictive housing, and at the same time that tools will have to be able to assist in achieving the main goals: security and order in the prison as well as rehabilitation and deterrent impact on inmates.
Keywords
Inmate; U.S. correctional system; prison; restrictive housing; correctional; regulations and policies
References
change, „International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology”, Vol. 56, No. 6, s. 622–640.
[2] Annual Survey of Jails 2014 ICPSR-36274-v1., 2015, Wyd. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Waszyngton.
[3] Foster H., 2016, The conditions of confinement in restrictive housing, [w:] Restrictive Housing in the U.S. Issues, Challenges and Future Directions, National Institute of
Justice, Waszyngton, listopad, s. 85–116.
[4] Gendreau P., Labrecque R.M., 2018, The effects of administrative segregation: A lesson in knowledge cumulation, [w:] Oxford handbook on prisons and imprisonment, red. J. Wooldredge, P. Smith, Oxford University Press, Nowy Jork, s. 340–366.
[5] Gordon S.E., 2014, Solitary Confinement, Public Safety, and Recidivism, „University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform”, Vol. 47, s. 495–528.
[6] Grassian S., 1983, Psychopathological Effects of Solitary Confinement, „American Journal of Psychiatry”, Vol. 140, s. 1450–1454.
[7] Grassian S., 2006, Psychiatric Effects of Solitary Confinement, „Washington University Journal of Law and Policy”, Vol. 22, s. 325–383.
[8] Haney C., 2018, Restricting the use of solitary confinement, „Annual Review of Criminology”, Vol. 1, s. 285–310.
[9] Kaba F., Solimo A., Graves J., Glowa-Kollisch S., Vise A., MacDonald R., Waters A., Venters H., 2015, Disparities in mental health referral and diagnosis in the New York
City jail mental health service, „American Journal of Public Health”, Vol. 105(9), s. 1911–1916.
[10] Kapoor R., Trestman R., 2016, Mental health effects of restrictive housing, [w:] Restrictive Housing in the U.S. Issues, Challenges and Future Directions, National
Institute of Justice, Waszyngton, listopad, s. 199–232.
[11] Labrecque R.M., 2016, The use of administrative segregation and its function in the institutional setting, [w:] Restrictive housing in the U.S.: Issues, challenges, and future
challenges, red. M. Garcia, National Institute of Justice, Waszyngton, s. 49–84.
[12] Mears D.P., 2006, Evaluating the effectiveness of supermax prisons, Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center, marzec.
[13] Mears D.P., Bales W.D., Hughes V., Brown J.M. i in.,2019, The new solitary confinement? A conceptual framework for guiding and assessing research and policy on
“restrictive housing”, „Criminal Justice and Behavior”, Vol. XX, No. 10, s. 1–23.
[14] Mears D.P., Mancini C., Beaver K.M., Gertz M., 2013, Housing the “worst of the worst” inmates: Public support for supermax prisons, „Crime and Delinquency”,
t. 59(4), s. 587–615.
[15] Odier P., 1982, The rock: A history of the fort/the prison, L’Image Odier Publishing Company, Eagle Rock.
[16] Reiter K., Ventura J., Lovell D., Augustine D., Barragan M. (i in.), 2020, Psychological Distress in Solitary Confinement: Symptoms, Severity, and Prevalence in the United
States, 2017–2018, „American Journal of Public Health”, Vol. 110 (supplement 1), s. 56–62.
[17] Shalev S., 2011, Supermax: Controlling risk through solitary confinement, Routledge, London–New York.
[18] Skarbek D., 2014, The social order of the underworld: how prison gangs govern the American penal system, Oxford University Press, New York.
[19] Smith P.S., 2006, The Effects of Solitary Confinement on Prison Inmates: A Brief History and Review of the Literature, „Crime and Justice”, Vol. 34, No. 1, s. 441–528.
[20] Steiner B., Calli C.M., 2016, The relationship between inmate misconduct, institutional violence and administrative segregation: a systematic review of the evidence, [w:]
Restrictive Housing in the U.S. Issues, Challenges and Future Directions, National Institute of Justice, Waszyngton, listopad, s. 165–197.
[21] Sundt J.L., Castellano T.C., Briggs C.S., 2008, The sociopolitical context of prison violence and its control: A case study of supermax and its effect in Illinois, „The Prison
Journal”, Vol. 88(1), s. 94–122.
Źródła internetowe
[22] Amnesty International, Cruel and Inhuman: Conditions of Isolation for detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Raport Amnesty International nr 51/051/2007, Wyd. Amnesty, onlinehttp://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/AMR51/051/2007 (dostęp: 20.12.2019).
[23] Association of State Correctional Administrators, The Arthur Liman Public Interest Program oraz Yale Law School, Aiming to reduce time in cell: reports from correctional
systems on the numbers of prisoners in restricted housing and on the potential of policy changes to bring about reforms, Wyd. Association of state correctional administrators,
The Arthur Liman Public Interest Program oraz Yale Law School, listopad 2016, dostęp online: https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/center/liman/document/aimingtoreducetic.pdf (dostęp: 03.01.2020).
[24] Beck A.J., 2015, Use of restrictive housing in U.S. Prisons and Jails 2011-2012, Wyd. BJS, Waszyngton październik 2015, online: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/
urhuspj1112.pdf (dostęp: 03.01.2020).
[25] Bronson J., Carson E.A., 2019, BJS Statistics, online: https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty = pbdetail&iid = 6546 (dostęp: 20.12.2019).
[26] Labrecque R.M., Smith P., 2013, Advancing the study of solitary confinement, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286857661_Advancing_the_study_of_solitary_
confinement (dostęp: 20.12.2019).
[27] Walmsley R., 2018, World Prison Poupulation List, 12 edycja, dotyczy danych z 223 państw świata, opublikowana we wrześniu 2018 r., online: https://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/wppl_12.pdf (dostęp: 20.12.2019).
Akademia Ekonomiczno-Humanistyczna w Warszawie Poland
Copyright Notice:
Articles are published in accordance with conditions identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also called as CC-BY) license conditions, available on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ and this permission applies to any language version or any later version of the license as published by the Creative Commons organization.
Author retain the copyright to the article, while at the same time he/she transfers the article property rights to the Publisher free of charge (without territorial and time restrictions).
The online edition of the Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation is published under Open Access, which means that users can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of these articles - are provided with full unrestricted access.
The publisher does not charge for providing access to full versions of articles nor for their use as referred to in above.
